Differing community responses to similar public health threats
Read the full review here [Note: not open access – pay per view]
There are significant differences in how communities respond to similar public health threats. More work is needed to develop theoretical models that apply to the community level and do not assume that a community’s response is simply the aggregate of individual responses.
This systematic review sought to understand the community-level drivers that could explain the variability in response to similar public health threats. 16 studies were included, most studies did not report sufficient data to allow an appropriate amount of validity. Potential explanatory drivers for the differing responses to similar health threats included prior experience and visibility of threat, sociodemographic characteristics, volume and type of media coverage, government reaction and availability of social support.
Adults, Both sexes (for groups of both male and female persons), Burns, Cardiovascular conditions, Child health, Cyclone/Hurricane/Typhoon, Disability, Ear nose throat and eye conditions, Earthquake, Endocrine and metabolic conditions, Extreme violence/Accidents, Flash flood/Flood, Gastrointestinal/Abdominal conditions, Genitourinary and gynaecologic conditions, Health, HIV and sexually transmitted infections, Infections and infectious diseases (all), Injuries (all), Landslide/mudslide, Logistics, Malaria and protozoal infections, Maternal and perinatal health, Mental health, Neoplasms and hematologic conditions, Nervous system and neurologic conditions, Non-communicable diseases (all), Orthopedic injuries, Other injuries, Pain and anaesthesia, Poisonings, Protection, Respiratory conditions, Rheumatologic conditions, Sexual and reproductive health, Skin infections, Tobacco drugs and alcohol, Vaccine-preventable infections, Viral fevers/VHF, Volcano, Zoonotic and other pathogens