Lopinave/Litonawe (LPV/r) reduced mortality in studies of SARS and MERS: uncertain if it is effective for patients with COVID-19
Citation: Jiang H, Deng H, Wang Y, Liu Z, Sun M, Zhou P, Xia Q, Lu C D, Zeng J. The possibility of using Lopinave/Litonawe (LPV/r) as treatment for novel coronavirus 2019-nCov pneumonia: a quick systematic review based on earlier coronavirus clinical studies. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine 2020: 29: Epub ahead of print
What is this? Like COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) are acute respiratory diseases caused by a coronavirus. Antiviral therapy with Lopinave/Litonawe (LPV/r) was used to treat patients with these earlier coronaviruses and might be considered as a treatment for COVID-19.
In this rapid systematic review, the authors searched Chinese and English literature databases for research of any design that compared LPV/r versus either placebo or standard care for patients with SARS or MERS, published between January 2003 and 24 January 2020. They identified 2 cohort studies (both for SARS patients), 1 case report (for MERS patients) and 1 clinical guideline (for MERS patients).
What works: Nothing noted.
What doesn’t work: Nothing noted.
What’s uncertain: Although early use of LPV/r regimen reduced the mortality of SARS and MERS, and reduced steroids dosing in the included studies, it is uncertain if it will be an effective treatment for patients with COVID-19.
Disclaimer: This summary has been written by staff and volunteers of Evidence Aid in order to make the content of the original document accessible to decision makers who are searching for the available evidence on the coronavirus (COVID-19) but may not have the time, initially, to read the original report in full. This summary is not intended as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians, other health workers, professional associations, guideline developers, or national governments and international agencies. If readers of this summary think that the evidence that is presented within it is relevant to their decision-making they should refer to the content and details of the original article, and the advice and guidelines offered by other sources of expertise, before making decisions. Evidence Aid cannot be held responsible for any decisions made about the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the basis of this summary alone.
Adults, Both sexes (for groups of both male and female persons), Epidemic/Endemic, Health, Healthcare workers, Infections and infectious diseases (all), Respiratory conditions, Zoonotic and other pathogens